Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Suicide, Shame, and the Painful Truth about Accomplishing Your Goals

Posted by Jon in Mistakes, Motivation | 258 comments

Dec 27, 12 Suicide, Shame, and the Painful Truth about Accomplishing Your Goals

I was in agony.

Waves of pain unimaginable shot down my spine, causing every muscle in my body to contract as if I’d been shocked with 20,000 volts of electricity. My back arched up at an unnatural angle. My arms and legs began to shake.

One moment, I was on a webinar talking to a few hundred people about traffic, walking them through exactly how to build a popular blog. The next, everything went dark. I was still conscious, but just barely.

Underneath the layers of pain, I remember thinking, “You can’t pass out. You have to finish talking about how to build an email list.” Of course, the pain was so bad I’d forgotten how to freaking see, much less pontificate on the intricacies of opt in pages.

So, I stopped. I waited a few seconds. My vision slowly returned, and I was able to wiggle the mouse up to the “Mute” button again.

For the next several minutes, I just sat there, quivering and trying to catch my breath as waves of pain continued up and down my spine. Eventually, the pain receded somewhat, and I wiggled the mouse back up to the “Mute” button again.

“Sorry folks,” I said. “Looks like GoToWebinar is having some technical difficulties. Can everyone hear me now?”

They said they could. We finished the webinar. Immediately afterward, I went to bed and stayed there for the next 16 hours.

And the worst part?

It was a normal day. I’d nearly collapsed on several webinars, not just that one. You might’ve even been on one of them.

Part of me worried if I was about to die. Another part hoped I would, just to be free of the pain.

I was at the end of my rope. One way or another, things were about to change.

Hold on, though. Let’s back up a bit.

When I was in college, my best friend calmly informed me he was going to kill himself.

A few months earlier, he had gone to the hospital in a horrible pain, and doctors found more than a dozen tumors nestled around his spine. He’d been on nonstop radiation treatments and narcotics ever since, but the tumors weren’t shrinking, and he was still in a lot of pain.

“I can’t take this anymore,” he said. “If this pain doesn’t stop, I’m going to blow my brains out. I’ve already bought the gun.”

I stared at him, horrified. Thanks to being born with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, I’ve had more than my share of tough times, including more than a dozen bouts with pneumonia, over 50 broken bones, and a spine reconstruction surgery with, I kid you not, a two-year recovery time.

But I never considered killing myself. Not once.

Noticing my silence, my friend looked up at me and wheezed out a small laugh. “You don’t understand, do you? Not even you.”

I shook my head. “Come on, man. You’re stronger than this. You’ll fight through.”

For a long time, he said nothing. Then, in almost a whisper, he said, “Strength doesn’t last forever.”

A few weeks later, he refused treatment. He would’ve died, if not for his four-year-old daughter breaking down in tears and begging him not to give up. Just to console her, he resumed treatment, and six months later, he was cancer free. He’s still alive to this day.

I never understood what he said, though. Not until almost the same thing happened to me.

For my entire life, I’ve been like Superman. I can’t move from the neck down, but I graduated college at the top of my class, built several successful businesses, and now I’m one of the most popular bloggers in the world.

But as it turns out, even Superman has his limits. Strength doesn’t last forever.

I didn’t tell anyone about the pain.

It started small enough. A bit of aching in my lower back, but nothing I couldn’t handle. I just plowed right through it like I usually do, working 12 hour days,

A few months after moving to Mexico though, I knew I was in trouble. The pain crept up until I felt like my legs were on fire, a dagger was buried between my shoulders, and a bullet was lodged in my brain.

Suffice it to say that it hurt. Bad.

Not just every now and again, either. I was in pain 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

And it was like kryptonite.

Where I used to have endless energy, I struggled just to stay alert for a few hours each day. Where I used to always be the smartest guy in the room, I went through the day feeling cloudy and confused. Where I used to have unshakable confidence, I was now afraid to get on the phone with a client for fear of falling apart in front of them.

I was able to do just enough to scrape by without my entire business falling apart, and I spent the rest of my time hiding, ashamed of what I had become:

Weak.

This went on for more than six months, and I didn’t tell a soul. Not my friends, not my family, not my employees. Only the nurses taking care of me knew what I was going through.

And for the first time in my life, I understood how somebody could commit suicide.

It’s not that they want to die, necessarily. They just want the pain to stop, and killing themselves seems like the only way.

Thankfully, I never got quite that hopeless. It might’ve happened eventually, but I held onto the belief that, no matter how bad it gets, eventually things will improve. That’s not always true, but that belief (or faith) kept me from ever considering taking my life.

I did come to understand suicide, though. All forms of it.

When a businessman loses all his money and puts a gun to his head, people think, “How could he do that? It’s only money.” What they don’t understand is it has nothing to do with money.

It’s about looking at your situation and knowing you don’t have what it takes to get through it. It’s too painful, and you’re too weak. That’s when you make one of two decisions.

You kill yourself.

Or you ask for help.

After six months of nearly nonstop pain, I came to an important realization:

I’m not Superman.

Yes, I’m super smart. Yes, I’m super disciplined. Yes, I’m super talented.

But bullets don’t bounce off my chest. I can’t go more than two days without sleep. If the pain gets bad enough, I will pass out.

In other words, I have limits. You’d think I would’ve known that, but I didn’t. I thought I could do everything, all by myself, forever.

Heh.

The harsh reality of the situation was, I needed help. Not just from doctors, but from my family, friends, employees, everyone.

So, I broke down and told them. I asked for help. I admitted I wasn’t Superman.

And surprise, surprise:

Everyone bent over backwards to help me.

My mother dropped out of her last semester in her MBA program to drive me back to the US to see some better doctors. One of my nurses left her husband and four-year-old daughter in Mexico, traveling with me and caring for me 24 hours a day. Marsha, my assistant, took over managing everything and everyone, even hiring a few extra people to carry the workload.

I went to see a renowned spinal surgeon. He ordered an MRI of my entire spine. I came back for the results, my palms sweating, my heart pounding, half expecting a death sentence.

“There’s good news and bad news,” the doctor said. “Which do you want first?”

I thought about it. “The good news.”

He smiled. “The good news is there’s nothing wrong with your spine. You’re fine. For now, at least.”

I didn’t believe him. “Then why am I in so much pain?”

“That brings us to the bad news,” he said. “Your blood pressure is 160/100, which I’m guessing is the stress of running your business. You’re about 30 pounds overweight, and because you have hardly any muscle in your back, it’s pushing your vertebrae together and pinching about a half-dozen nerves.”

I was stunned. “You mean I just need to relax and lose weight?”

He smiled. “You got it.” We shook hands, and he walked out the door.

Fast forward three months, and I’m about 10 pounds lighter, I no longer work weekends, and I’ve doubled the size of my staff. The result: my blood pressure is now 125/80, and the pain is worlds better. It’s still there, for sure, but it’s going down, and I think it might disappear completely after losing another 20 pounds.

In retrospect, I feel like an idiot.

I was working myself to death. Literally. At the time, I was even proud of it. As it turns out, though, I’m not Superman.

And the painful truth?

You’re not either.

It isn’t a lack of talent.

It’s not bad luck.

It has nothing to do with traffic.

The problem is Superman Syndrome. You’re smart and motivated and hard-working, so you figure you have everything it takes to build a popular blog.

Wrong.

To understand why, imagine you’re going on a long trip with some friends, and the airlines will only let you take one suitcase. You stuff it full, zip it closed, and then start to walk out the door, but then you notice one sock you overlooked. You unzip the suitcase, cram in the sock, and try to close it again, but now it’s just too full. It won’t close.

Well, that suitcase is your life, and the sock is your blog.

Chances are, you’re already running yourself ragged between work and family and friends, and there’s just no more room for anything else. It seems like you should be able to squeeze in time for your blog, because after all, it’s just a few hours here and there, but for most people, it’s “one sock too many.”

So, you have five choices:

Quit. Decide your life is just too full, and leave blogging to other people.Shove the sock in any way, risking making the suitcase explode. (That’s what I used to do. Not surprisingly, the suitcase, my life, eventually exploded in the form of horrific pain.)Leave something behind. Stop watching television, quit your job, or hire an assistant to do the laundry and your groceries for you.Learn to pack more efficiently. If you get serious about time management, you can, in fact, get more done in the same amount of time, but it has its limits.Give the sock to a friend to carry. In other words, ask for help.

In my experience, a combination of #4 and #5 is the right answer for most people who are serious about building a popular blog. #3 can also work, but it requires Olympic athlete self-discipline, and if you had that, you would already be a popular blogger.

You’ll also be tempted to believe you can get by only with #4, time management, but it’s not true. You can’t take care of your kids, hold a full-time job, and build a blog at the same time any more than you can squeeze a stretch limousine into a suitcase. It’s just not possible.

So, what do you do?

To use our suitcase metaphor, you ask a friend to carry the sock for you.

More specifically:

The biggest time sinkhole for most bloggers is the technical stuff. You beat your head against the wall trying to get your theme, plug-ins, e-mail list, and web hosting working together, wasting weeks or even months where you should have been writing posts.

The solution?

Outsource it.

Thanks to the glory of the Internet, there are thousands of freelance techies out there waiting for work, and the rates are surprisingly cheap. You can get a lot of simple WordPress problems solved on Fiverr.com, where everything costs five bucks. For more complex jobs, go to oDesk.com and hire someone in India, Russia, or the Philippines.

You might think you can’t afford it, but it’s astonishingly cheap. You can get almost any problem taken care of for less than $50.

What’s more valuable to you: $50 or three months of progress you lost by trying to do it yourself?

Also, asking for help doesn’t always mean hiring a freelancer. A lot of successful bloggers I know have designated hours where they write, and they get their family and friends to agree not to interrupt them, unless it’s a life or death emergency.

If you’re really brazen, you can even take it a step further and ask them to do the laundry, pick the kids up from school, get groceries, and all the other little tasks you normally do, just to give you a chance to write. You might be surprised at what they would do for you, if they understood how serious you are.

The bottom line?

Whatever you do, don’t try to keep going by yourself. You’ll fail.

Maybe not at first, but eventually, your strength will run out. Hopefully you won’t drive yourself to the brink of despair like I did, but you might still burn yourself out and want to quit. Maybe you’re already there.

If you are, the solution isn’t audacious goals.

The solution isn’t positive thinking.

The solution isn’t more self-discipline.

It’s surrounding yourself with people who can help you shoulder the load. No one can go it alone. Not even you.

So, stop trying.

Pull out your list of goals, and write down beside each one who is going to help you accomplish it. If you can’t think of anyone, make finding someone your biggest priority.

After all, that’s the real story, isn’t it? Not a superhero, standing alone against the darkness, but a superhero and a sidekick, steely-eyed and ready for war.

Hurry up and get yourself one.

And then go out there and kick some butt in 2013. The bad guys won’t know what hit ‘em. :-)

About the Author: Jon Morrow is the Founder and CEO of Boost Blog Traffic.


View the original article here

Friday, May 17, 2013

Adobe CEO: The Truth About Creative Cloud

Shantanu-narayenLance-ulanoff By Lance Ulanoff2013-05-06 21:55:30 UTC

Adobe's decision to discontinue the boxed version of Creative Suite and move to a subscription software-based model (also known as the Creative Cloud) stunned many customers, but considering recent moves, like the acquisition and integration of Behance, the introduction of a cloud subscription option and Adobe’s desire to support transmedia activities, none of this should come as a surprise. Even so, customer shock, anger and confusion are well in evidence in the hundreds of comments piling up under Mashable's post on the announcement.

With that in mind, Mashable got on the phone with Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen to dispel at least some of the myth and rumor surrounding Adobe Creative Cloud.

Narayen said that there are more than a few financial changes that come as a result of the switch. Without boxed software, the relationship with channel partners changes (though Narayen didn't say exactly how). In fact the whole financial model changes. Among the new performance metrics Wall Street will look for in Adobe is "number of subscribers" and "annualized recurring revenue."

Narayen also admits that they won't be paying for product packaging any more.

On the other hand, some costs are rising for Adobe: Narayen said cloud services require storage space. There is also the expectation, with cloud-connected services, that updates and innovation will arrive more quickly, "For engineers and the product team, it's a canvas for delivering products and innovation at a more rapid pace."

While this isn't a move solely devoted to defeating software pirates, Narayen says the shift will improve the situation. "It allows us to provide different offerings in different emerging markets without worrying about gray markets."

There's an ongoing debate in Mashable's comments about whether or not Adobe's subscription model will cost Adobe customers more than buying Creative Suite 6 outright (with a perpetual license). Narayen insists that the cost for Adobe CC is now lower for "any customer." Those costs are now more predictable, he added.

There's also, Narayen contends, the chance that customers will save money because they don’t have to pay for additional services that now come with Adobe CC. These include cloud-based storage and even Behance, which allows Adobe CC users to "share portfolios and monetize skill sets," said Narayen.

As for those who just purchased Creative Suite 6, Adobe is offering aggressive discounts.

Whether customers are looking to start out on Creative Suite or are current customers, Narayen sees great benefit in this new path. "To a lot of people, they've actually stated that the lower price of entry is in all honesty a better way for them to become a member of the creative cloud generation," he said.

Adobe's Creative Cloud is not exactly a cloud-based app. Narayen accurately describes it as a hybrid solution. You will still install local software. The subscription model ($29 a month for an app or $49 a month for the full Creative Suite) means you gain access to the latest software updates as soon as they become available in the cloud, as well as all the cloud-based services and integration available to CC members.

No Internet? No problem. Narayen told Mashable the apps will still work. "It's the best of both worlds," he added.

Adobe no longer sells boxed software, though you can by perpetual license versions of Adobes' hobbyist Elements software products. Narayen said Adobe has no immediate subscription-based plans for those products, but the migration to digital copies is the wave of the future. Narayen's advice to the rest of the software industry, "Companies that wish to thrive in this next tech era need to embrace or perish. We’re not only embracing, we’re leading."

Even so, not everyone has broadband access and for those who find downloading Creative Suite-sized apps prohibitive, Narayen promises, "We'll get them the software they need."

In a word, yes. During the Adobe MAX Convention in Los Angeles, the software giant showed off two intriguing prototypes: One a digital ruler and the other a cloud-connected stylus or pen. The pen makes it possible to, Narayen explained, have “all your assets with you on any device.” Narayen cautioned, however, that neither one of these products is shipping.

Narayen, who has been with Adobe since 1998, is the first to admit that he could not have envisioned today's digital landscape 15 years ago. "It's amazing what has happened with technology and what Adobe has done ... We are not just transforming how people make this content, we're transforming how they manage it, how they measure it and how they monetize it."

Perhaps Narayen is so sanguine about the changes because he's been through this before. When Adobe announced in 2003 it was introducing product "collections and suites," customers and industry watchers wondered about Adobe's motivations. Was it all about money? Ultimately Adobe's Creative Suite of products became the standard.

Narayen anticipates a similar kind of embrace for Adobe CC. "A few years from now, people will say, 'How could I even imagine a Photoshop that was not connected to the cloud?'"

What do you think of Narayen’s explanations? Are you ready for subscription-based creativity software? Let us know in the comments.

Image via Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Topics: Adobe Creative Suite 6, Apps and Software, creative cloud, Marketing, Tech if(window.pageChanged) window.omni({"channel":"tech","content_type":"article","top_channel":"tech","content_source_type":"Internal","content_source_name":"Internal","author_name":"Lance Ulanoff","age":"0","pub_day":6,"pub_month":5,"pub_year":2013,"pub_date":"05/06/2013","isPostView":true,"post_lead_type":"Default"}); metaData = {"link":[["canonical","http://mashable.com/2013/05/06/adobe-ceo-interview-creative-cloud/"],["image_src","http://rack.0.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA1LzA2LzM0L1NoYW50YW51TmFyLjRiZjBmLmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTcyMHg3MjAjCmUJanBn/cd901e07/8f3/Shantanu-Narayen.jpg"]],"meta_property":[["og:url","http://mashable.com/2013/05/06/adobe-ceo-interview-creative-cloud/"],["og:title","Adobe CEO: The Truth About Creative Cloud"],["og:type","article"],["og:site_name","Mashable"],["og:image","http://rack.0.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA1LzA2LzM0L1NoYW50YW51TmFyLjRiZjBmLmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTcyMHg3MjAjCmUJanBn/cd901e07/8f3/Shantanu-Narayen.jpg"],["og:article:published_time","2013-05-06T21:55:30Z"],["og:article:modified_time","2013-05-06T21:55:39Z"]],"meta_name":[["description","Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen tries to dispel at least some of the myth and rumor surrounding Adobe Creative Cloud."],["keywords",["adobe","uncategorized","marketing","tech","apps-software","adobe-creative-suite-6","creative-cloud"]],["twitter:title","Adobe CEO: The Truth About Creative Cloud"],["twitter:description","Adobe's decision to discontinue the boxed version of Creative Suite and move to a subscription software-based model (also known as the Creative Cloud) stunned many customers, but considering recent mo..."],["twitter:image","http://rack.2.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA1LzA2LzM0L1NoYW50YW51TmFyLjRiZjBmLmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTU2MHg3NTAKZQlqcGc/95c039c1/8f3/Shantanu-Narayen.jpg"],["twitter:site","@mashable"],["twitter:url","http://mashable.com/2013/05/06/adobe-ceo-interview-creative-cloud/"],["twitter:creator","@mashable"],["twitter:card","photo"],["twitter:image:width","560"],["twitter:image:height","750"]],"short_url":[["short_url","http://on.mash.to/16ORfOf"]]};

View the original article here

Thursday, May 9, 2013

The Disturbing Truth About Dog Dreams

Matt Petronzio2013-04-27 20:16:00 UTC

If you have a dog, you already know how entertaining it is to watch him sleep. With soft growls and frantically running paws, Rufus is adorable as he frolics through dreamland.

But in this comic, Josh Mecouch of Formal Sweatpants shows us what Rufus is really dreaming about — and it isn't pretty. You'll never look at your sleeping pup the same way again.

Dog Dream Comic, Formal Sweatpants

Comic illustration by Josh Mecouch, Formal Sweatpants. Published with permission; all rights reserved.

Topics: Comics, dogs, Formal Sweatpants, humor, Watercooler if(window.pageChanged) window.omni({"channel":"watercooler","content_type":"article","top_channel":"watercooler","content_source_type":"Internal - Editorial Series","content_source_name":"edit-comics","author_name":"Matt Petronzio","age":"0","pub_day":27,"pub_month":4,"pub_year":2013,"pub_date":"04/27/2013","isPostView":true,"post_lead_type":"No Lead Image"}); metaData = {"link":[["canonical","http://mashable.com/2013/04/27/dog-dreams-comic/"],["image_src","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA0LzI3Lzk5L2RvZ2RyZWFtdGh1LmU0MDQ5LmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTcyMHg3MjAjCmUJanBn/46885bc8/010/dog-dream-thumb.jpg"]],"meta_property":[["og:url","http://mashable.com/2013/04/27/dog-dreams-comic/"],["og:title","The Disturbing Truth About Dog Dreams [COMICS]"],["og:type","article"],["og:site_name","Mashable"],["og:image","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA0LzI3Lzk5L2RvZ2RyZWFtdGh1LmU0MDQ5LmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTcyMHg3MjAjCmUJanBn/46885bc8/010/dog-dream-thumb.jpg"],["og:article:published_time","2013-04-27T20:16:00Z"],["og:article:modified_time","2013-04-27T20:16:11Z"]],"meta_name":[["description","In this comic, we find out what dogs really dream about -- and it isn't pretty."],["keywords",["comic","comics","dogs","humor","uncategorized","watercooler","formal-sweatpants"]],["twitter:title","The Disturbing Truth About Dog Dreams"],["twitter:description","If you have a dog, you already know how entertaining it is to watch him sleep. With soft growls and frantically running paws, Rufus is adorable as he frolics through dreamland. SEE ALSO: More Comics o..."],["twitter:image","http://rack.0.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA0LzI3Lzk5L2RvZ2RyZWFtdGh1LmU0MDQ5LmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTU2MHg3NTAKZQlqcGc/f926afd2/010/dog-dream-thumb.jpg"],["twitter:site","@mashable"],["twitter:url","http://mashable.com/2013/04/27/dog-dreams-comic/"],["twitter:creator","@mashable"],["twitter:card","photo"],["twitter:image:width","560"],["twitter:image:height","750"]],"short_url":[["short_url","http://on.mash.to/10jWtJe"]]};

View the original article here

Friday, April 26, 2013

It's Time for Truth on Social Media

Social-media-literacyEmily Banks2013-04-20 18:46:29 UTC

Mashable OP-ED

“If your mother says she loves you, check it out.” I heard those words early in my journalism career. Reporters are trained to verify information they receive by confirming with a trusted source, but the media landscape has changed, even since I first heard that adage.

With social networks like Facebook and Twitter, news flows faster than ever. And the news is no longer centrally controlled, making it potentially less trustworthy. Reporters have more access to information through social media, but it’s no longer just journalists delivering that information. The power of information-sharing now rests in the hands of everyday people — that means you.

In a Harvard Nieman Report, Mark Little, founder and CEO of social news agency Storyful, wrote:

Not too long ago, reporters were the guardians of scarce facts delivered at an appointed time to a passive audience. Today we are the managers of an overabundance of information and content, discovered, verified and delivered in partnership with active communities.

Any individual or media organization can instantly send a piece of news to the web. This makes things more competitive — in print, everyone always wanted to be first (and right). But social media and the speed of digital news raise the stakes.

We’ve been watching this play out all week, following the Boston Marathon bombings. For instance, reports from trusted news sources to individual Twitter users inaccurately stated authorities held a suspect in custody.

Georgetown political scientist Jonathan Ladd suggests the rise of the Internet and cable news, and the resulting diversification and fragmentation of the media, have caused a general distrust in the media. He writes in a blog post, “Because of technological changes, such as the rise of cable and the Internet, as well as regulatory changes, such as the end of the fairness doctrine, the media industry has become much more diverse and fragmented.”

He's right. But I'd take that one step further to include, specifically, social media's effect on fragmented news consumption.

And it’s not just the social media accounts of journalists and news organizations. Media consumers now have more opportunities to glean news straight from primary sources.

We saw Friday how Boston residents and reporters shared information on social networks about the manhunt for the bombing suspects. On social media, they shared real-time photos, videos and information about the circumstances they witnessed.

They also shared information they heard over police scanners. A decade ago, listening in on law enforcement chatter required expensive equipment, limiting police scanners' use mainly to hobbyists and journalists.

Today, you need nothing more than a smartphone. Apps like the 5-0 Radio Police Scanner browse scanners around the world, porting criminal activities and police information to you anywhere.

Immediately following the bombings Monday, I used 5-O on my iPhone to access information from Boston. But the whole time, I remained aware that the officers I heard weren't always aware of the facts. What they said wasn’t necessarily true or verifiable. And I couldn't verify it, I shouldn't report it.

The average person may not operate with that same filter, though. Unverified information heard over the scanner could turn into a tweet, which could get picked up by a media outlet and, thus, become a (potentially inaccurate) news report.

In his book Trust Me, I'm Lying, Ryan Holiday writes about the dangerous and exploitative practices of bloggers and social media users, which in turn, can spread like wildfire. It’s a pattern we’ve witnessed this week.

"The more immediate the nature of their publishing medium (blogs, then newspapers, then magazines), the more heavily a journalist will depend on sketchy online sources, like social media, for research," he writes.

This process relies on a "delegation of trust:" reporting what others are reporting. Because NPR is a "trusted" source, other news outlets reported its false claim that Gabrielle Giffords had been fatally shot.

When a trusted site or Twitter user publishes something, we assume they did their due diligence by confirming the veracity and authenticity of a claim, and therefore, the news is safe to repeat as fact. Not always so.

However, some more optimistic media professionals believe social media can help verify information and sources. We can follow the digital footprint of social media users.

In his book Hacking the Future, Cole Stryker writes,

"Contrary to conventional wisdom, one actually has more access to evidence with social media than traditional off-line sources."

"Contrary to conventional wisdom, one actually has more access to evidence with social media than traditional off-line sources."

In some instances, perhaps this is a good thing. But this week, that "evidence" became fodder for hasty accusation, as Redditors attempted to crowdsource the investigation and identification of the Boston Marathon bombers. As the week played out, it became apparent the Reddit search would not trump the one led by authorities.

Unfiltered information, without context or verification — usually the job of journalists — can be dangerous, as Storyful founder Little points out:

When I was a young TV journalist, the phrase ‘golden hour’ meant the early evening light that bathed faces and landscapes in a warm forgiving glow. As a social journalist, I've started to use the term in a different way. I now think of the golden hour as the time it takes social media to create either an empowering truth or an unstoppable lie, when a celebrity death trends on Twitter or an explosive video surfaces on YouTube. In other words, when journalism can matter most.

According to Little and the BBC, journalists should answer these questions when attempting to verify the truth behind user-generated content.

Can you speak to the original source of the material?

Can you geo-locate the photo or video? Can you correspond landmarks to those in Google Maps?

Do the streets look similar to those on Panoramio or Google Street View?

Does weather in the footage correspond to weather reports from that day?

Does the reported time of day correspond to where shadows should be at that time?

Do traffic signs and vehicle plates show the correct locale?

Does this footage look similar to that being uploaded by other users in the location?

Does the information or footage seem too good to be true?

Where did the material first appear online?

By leveraging technology resources, human knowledge and community history, journalists and individuals can seek to verify the authenticity of user-generated content.

More than two years ago, founder of Storify Burt Herman wrote for The New York Times: “A new class of gatekeepers has arisen, people whose reputations are built on their ability to highlight relevant information to their audiences. We are still looking for the right word to call these new gatekeepers, but so far ‘curator’ is what appears most appropriate.”

It's safe to say, today, that all social media consumers should be their own curators — consuming, verifying and disseminating what is accurate and relevant — because more information is easily available to us than ever before.

I still believe we can trust legacy institutions to provide us with the truth — most of the time. Still, we need to be smart media consumers by remembering that even the trusted institutions get stories wrong. And, as journalists, there's more than one side to a story, more than one truth. We must use the technologies at our disposal to determine which ones are accurate, and all social media users, including both content curators and content creators, must remember: “If your mother tells you she loves you, check it out.”

Image via Darren McCollester/Getty Images

Topics: Boston Marathon, journalism, Media, opinion, Social Media, World if(window.pageChanged) window.omni({"channel":"social-media","content_type":"article","top_channel":"social-media","content_source_type":"Internal","content_source_name":"Internal","author_name":"Emily Banks","age":"0","pub_day":20,"pub_month":4,"pub_year":2013,"pub_date":"04/20/2013","isPostView":true,"post_lead_type":"Default"}); metaData = {"link":[["canonical","http://mashable.com/2013/04/20/truth-on-social-media/"],["image_src","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA0LzIwLzg3L3NvY2lhbG1lZGlhLmZjOTBkLmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTcyMHg3MjAjCmUJanBn/f6ab86bd/7da/social-media-literacy.jpg"]],"meta_property":[["og:url","http://mashable.com/2013/04/20/truth-on-social-media/"],["og:title","It's Time for Truth on Social Media"],["og:type","article"],["og:site_name","Mashable"],["og:image","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA0LzIwLzg3L3NvY2lhbG1lZGlhLmZjOTBkLmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTcyMHg3MjAjCmUJanBn/f6ab86bd/7da/social-media-literacy.jpg"],["og:article:published_time","2013-04-20T18:46:29Z"],["og:article:modified_time","2013-04-20T18:49:38Z"]],"meta_name":[["description","It\u2019s no longer just journalists delivering information. With social media, the power of information-sharing now rests in the hands of everyday people."],["keywords",["media","features","journalism","opinion","uncategorized","social-media","world","boston-marathon"]],["twitter:title","It's Time for Truth on Social Media"],["twitter:description","\u201cIf your mother says she loves you, check it out.\u201d I heard those words early in my journalism career. Reporters are trained to verify information they receive by confirming with a trusted source, but ..."],["twitter:image","http://rack.2.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA0LzIwLzg3L3NvY2lhbG1lZGlhLmZjOTBkLmpwZwpwCXRodW1iCTU2MHg3NTAKZQlqcGc/af926be2/7da/social-media-literacy.jpg"],["twitter:site","@mashable"],["twitter:url","http://mashable.com/2013/04/20/truth-on-social-media/"],["twitter:creator","@mashable"],["twitter:card","photo"],["twitter:image:width","560"],["twitter:image:height","750"]],"short_url":[["short_url","http://on.mash.to/11pw3tH"]]};

View the original article here

Saturday, March 30, 2013

The Honest Truth Behind 'Les Miserables'

2013-03-26 16:04:22 UTC

Now that Les Miserables is off the Oscar docket, we can all freely speak our minds about the content of the movie without fearing retribution from film buffs.

Who better to wage war against musical plot holes and nonsensical casting than Honest Trailers? They are never going to let Wolverine live this one down. And, remind me, why was Borat in this movie?

But most of all, the notorious movie parodiers at Screen Junkies pick a bone about the never-ending sing-song dialogue, which is made especially awkward because it's Gladiator doing the singing.

Now we get what the French people were revolting against: musicals.

40143000858 42231703091 39532612798 39532675089 Tumblr_mg15chp2z51s2rngco1_400 39622794920 Tumblr_mg15dgs2n51s2rngco1_1280 Tumblr_mgfpjraqgo1s2rngco1_500 Tumblr_mh24jchy8l1s2rngco1_500

Image courtesy of YouTube, Screen Junkies

Topics: anne hathaway, Film, honest trailers, Les Misérables, Share as Post, trailers, Videos, Watercooler, YouTube Video Lead if(window.pageChanged) window.omni({"channel":"watercooler","content_type":"article","top_channel":"watercooler","content_source_type":"Internal","content_source_name":"Internal","author_name":"Neha Prakash","age":"0","pub_day":26,"pub_month":3,"pub_year":2013,"pub_date":"03/26/2013","isPostView":true,"post_lead_type":"YouTube Video Lead"}); metaData = {"link":[["canonical","http://mashable.com/2013/03/26/les-mis-honest-trailers/"],["image_src","http://rack.3.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzAzLzI2LzY0L2xlc21pcy44NDhkYy5wbmcKcAl0aHVtYgk3MjB4NzIwIwplCWpwZw/a8610070/1cf/lesmis.jpg"]],"meta_property":[["og:url","http://mashable.com/2013/03/26/les-mis-honest-trailers/"],["og:title","The Honest Truth Behind 'Les Miserables' [VIDEO] "],["og:type","article"],["og:site_name","Mashable"],["og:image","http://rack.3.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzAzLzI2LzY0L2xlc21pcy44NDhkYy5wbmcKcAl0aHVtYgk3MjB4NzIwIwplCWpwZw/a8610070/1cf/lesmis.jpg"],["og:article:published_time","2013-03-26T16:04:22Z"],["og:article:modified_time","2013-03-26T16:04:42Z"]],"meta_name":[["description","Honest Trailers questions the many plot points and casting decisions of 'Les Miserables' and reminds us how much we all hate musicals. "],["keywords",["trailers","uncategorized","anne-hathaway","film","share-as-post","watercooler","videos","les-mis-rables","youtube-video-lead","honest-trailers"]],["twitter:title","The Honest Truth Behind 'Les Miserables'"],["twitter:description","Now that Les Miserables is off the Oscar docket, we can all freely speak our minds about the content of the movie without fearing retribution from film buffs. Who better to wage war against musical pl..."],["twitter:image","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzAzLzI2LzY0L2xlc21pcy44NDhkYy5wbmcKcAl0aHVtYgk1NjB4NzUwCmUJanBn/b6618a0e/1cf/lesmis.jpg"],["twitter:site","@mashable"],["twitter:url","http://mashable.com/2013/03/26/les-mis-honest-trailers/"],["twitter:creator","@mashable"],["twitter:card","player"],["twitter:player","https://www.youtube.com/embed/IBYfA3zTxFE"],["twitter:player:width","435"],["twitter:player:height","245"]]};

View the original article here