See Artist Alison Jackson's Imagined Portraits of Prince William, Kate Middleton, and the Royal Baby

“I chase people down the street and go up to people in restaurants,” says the London artist Alison Jackson about her endless search for perfect celebrity look-alikes. “And every agency possible, and Facebook and Twitter, and Skype castings.” Since her series Doubletake aired on BBC Two in 2002 and then won a BAFTA, Jackson has become well known in the U.K. for these faux ­tableaux, involving familiar faces of every kind: sports, Hollywood, Angela Merkel. (New York readers may remember her paparazzi-style “first photos!” of Brad and Angelina’s baby in 2006.) She’s exhibited at SFMoMA and the Centre Pompidou, as well as at New York’s International Center of Photography.

Jackson’s work gets right at the nub of our imagined relationship with celebrities: We project surprisingly complex lives onto people we don’t actually know. (You may well come away from these photos considering whether Queen Elizabeth would carry an iPhone.) This series, of course, carries the added frisson of being about a clan that—unlike, say, the Kardashians—would never allow such images to exist. They feel forbidden, illicit, even though the scenes are basically affectionate toward William and Kate and their family. That’s a point Jackson hastens to make: “I’m not going to do anything horrible,” she says. “I don’t really like using ridicule as a form of humor.” The fun, and the effectiveness, comes in the just-at-the-edge-of-plausibility details: the queen with her Times crossword, the prince’s pocket square incongruous over a fresh diaper. Speaking of which: Jackson hedged her bet on the gender of Not Baby Windsor. “I couldn’t tell while I was shooting,” she jokes, adding that she cast an infant who could pass for either a boy or a girl.

*This article originally appeared in the July 8, 2013 issue of New York Magazine.           

View the original article here

Worst Possible Cybersecurity Breaches Could Be Far Worse Than You Imagined

Josh Meyer for Quartz 2013-05-05 21:02:09 UTC

The cyber-ruffians who briefly tanked the stock market last week by faking a news tweet about an attack at the White House showed how much damage can be done with a few well-placed keystrokes. Those who hacked into a Department of Labor website earlier this week could have wreaked even more havoc, say, if they successfully tweaked the monthly jobs report.

Neither seemed particularly sophisticated, or malicious. But they do pose the obvious question: How much damage could a group of well-trained hackers do, economic and otherwise, if they really wanted to?

That's a question Paul Rosenzweig has been thinking about for a while. He's a former top U.S. Department of Homeland Security official and author of the recently published book, Cyber Warfare: How Conflicts in Cyberspace Are Challenging America and Changing the World. The book's cheerful premise is that technological advances, combined with the ubiquity of the Internet, have spawned a near-infinite range of potentially grave security threats to governments, commercial entities and individuals.

It doesn't take Rosenzweig long to come up with some unsettling scenarios. Most involve either disruption or disinformation, like the Associated Press Twitter account hack.

Here are just a few of them:

Spreading disinformation through trusted sources about a dangerous escalation of a geopolitical flashpoint, prompting a plunge in global markets that lasts for days before it's corrected. North Korea's Kim Jong-Un launches ICBMs at the United States, for instance, or Israel attacks Iran's nuclear program, squeezing the global oil supply.

Hacking into the Industrial Control Systems (ICS) that run so many government and private sector systems, disrupting dams, oil refineries, the power grid, utility companies — or the global banking system known as SWIFT. (A Chinese hacker is suspected in a recent intrusion into a U.S. government database cataloging dam vulnerabilities, according to the Washington Free Beacon.)

Disrupting trading on the New York, London or Tokyo stock exchanges, or finding a way to wipe out, or corrupt, the vast database of prior trades.

Messing with the space-based satellite navigation system that provides location and time information for just about everything these days. "Think of this,'" Rosenzweig says. "What if someone started degrading the information that GPS runs on? It's just data, ones and zeros that come down from satellites. You could make our missiles less accurate, our planes less able to fly or less safe. You could intercept, degrade it, or spoof it — send false signals, and make the planes think they are somewhere else."

How serious are these threats? "All of these are very, very real vulnerabilities," says Rosenzweig. "There are people who would love to do these to us but don't have the capability yet, like Al Qaeda. There are others, like Russia, China and Iran, who could do much of it, and they might do it at some point. But when, and why, we don't know." One question is whether state actors like Russia, China and Iran would authorize something that could be construed as an act of war, or certainly a serious provocation that could prompt a U.S. military cyber-response.

Rosenzweig, who now runs the Red Branch Law Consulting firm, wouldn't talk about the work he did on highly-classified "Red Teams" tasked by the government to think up such scenarios as a way of thwarting them. But he says such efforts are becoming increasingly urgent as cybersecurity experts try to anticipate what kind of hacks could really do serious damage.

Photo via Flickr, Milpool79

This article originally published at Quartz here

Topics: Tech, U.S., World Quartz is a Mashable publishing partner that is a new kind of global business news outlet.

if(window.pageChanged) window.omni({"channel":"tech","content_type":"article","top_channel":"tech","content_source_type":"MPP","content_source_name":"Quartz","author_name":"Quartz","age":"0","pub_day":5,"pub_month":5,"pub_year":2013,"pub_date":"05/05/2013","isPostView":true,"post_lead_type":"Default"}); metaData = {"link":[["canonical","http://qz.com/81268/the-worst-possible-cybersecurity-breaches-could-be-far-worse-than-you-imagined/"],["image_src","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA1LzA1LzI0L2hvb3ZlcmRhbS5lYzk0OC5qcGcKcAl0aHVtYgk3MjB4NzIwIwplCWpwZw/9f94aa1f/d59/hoover-dam.jpg"]],"meta_property":[["og:url","http://mashable.com/2013/05/05/cybersecurity-breaches/"],["og:title","Worst Possible Cybersecurity Breaches Could Be Far Worse Than You Imagined"],["og:type","article"],["og:site_name","Mashable"],["og:image","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA1LzA1LzI0L2hvb3ZlcmRhbS5lYzk0OC5qcGcKcAl0aHVtYgk3MjB4NzIwIwplCWpwZw/9f94aa1f/d59/hoover-dam.jpg"],["og:article:published_time","2013-05-05T21:02:09Z"],["og:article:modified_time","2013-05-05T21:02:21Z"]],"meta_name":[["description","The cyber-ruffians who briefly tanked the stock market last week by faking a news tweet about an attack at the White House showed how much damage can be done with a few well-pla..."],["keywords",["uncategorized","tech","us","world"]],["twitter:title","Worst Possible Cybersecurity Breaches Could Be Far Worse Than You Imagined"],["twitter:description","The cyber-ruffians who briefly tanked the stock market last week by faking a news tweet about an attack at the White House showed how much damage can be done with a few well-placed keystrokes. Those w..."],["twitter:image","http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEzLzA1LzA1LzI0L2hvb3ZlcmRhbS5lYzk0OC5qcGcKcAl0aHVtYgk1NjB4NzUwCmUJanBn/2e7d0ef6/d59/hoover-dam.jpg"],["twitter:site","@mashable"],["twitter:url","http://mashable.com/2013/05/05/cybersecurity-breaches/"],["twitter:creator","@mashable"],["twitter:card","photo"],["twitter:image:width","560"],["twitter:image:height","750"]],"short_url":[["short_url","http://on.mash.to/10dGS3V"]]};

View the original article here